Could DSA Be the Beginning of USSA?

Most of the world thought the final blow to socialism and communism occured when the Soviet Union fell in 1991. However, China and a few other authoritarian nations maintained their grip on their people by relying on a regional context for the oppressive system. A few other governments resorted to a version of socialism which they called democratic socialism. This deceptively-named concept gained a lone but outspoken proponent in America who became Senator Bernie Sanders 20 years ago. Back then, I would smirk at any speculation that our great freedom-loving nation could ever entertain the radical system of socialism. We conservative patriots all stood idle as, in just two decades, leftists began electing self-described “democratic socialists” to the county’s highest city and state offices. It wasn’t just crazy Bernie anymore. The fight for the soul of America is upon us. Let’s take a closer look at just how much of a threat this “democratic socialist” movement is.

First, we must understand that this “new” far-left faction of the Democratic Party is not new at all. It is socialism plain and simple–right out of playbook of Karl Marx, the father of socialism. Placing the adjective “democratic” in the label just makes it easier for Americans to swallow. Columnist Bradley R. Gitz, Ph.D, recently wrote that there can never be “…something called ‘democratic socialism’ (as in the Democratic Socialists of America, DSA). The term is an oxymoron because the two elements–socialism and democracy–don’t go together.” He further says, “Socialism, properly defined, means state ownership of the means of production. And there has never been a state with ownership of the means of production that was also a democracy.” And socialism has never been successful–anywhere.

Socialism is the economic arm of communist dictatorships. Marx saw socialism and communism inextricably linked with socialism being a first step to communism after capitalism is overthrown. So, dispite the lies by advocates of democratic socialism in America, socialism, by any name, and communism are one and the same and interchangeable. Today’s socialism is, by design, tomorrow’s communism. For the first time in our history, we are electing socialists to powerful positions who would like to see the United States of America become the United Socialist States of America (USSA).

Pardon a little levity here, but this quip that you are likely familiar with is the best comparison that I have seen for the world’s opposing governing systems:

  • Socialism: You have two cows. The government takes one cow and gives it to your neighbor.
  • Communism: You have two cows. The government takes both cows, and they may give you some milk if you behave.
  • Capitalism: You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull.

DSA’s website contains their platform adopted last month. It includes scrapping the U.S. Senate, abolishing the carceral (prison) forces of the capitalist state, defunding the Department of War, amnesty for all immigrants, replacing the President and Supreme Court with an executive and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress, and voting rights for all non-citizens. This is just a portion of the platform on which Zohran Mamdani, New York CIty Mayor, and six DSA state congressmen got elected. Dozens of other DSA members have been elected to city councils and local offices around the country. Three additional DSA members running for the U.S. Congress have won their democratic primaries in blue states and are likely to see victory in November. Sitting congresswomen Alexandria Ocasio-Cortex and Rashida Tlaib are DSA Democrats. DSA is no longer a fringe group. It appears to be in driver’s seat of the present Democratic Party. Who could have even imagined this 20 years ago?

The greatest threat to America in 2026 is not our foreign adversaries but rather the rapidly rising power of domestic socialists and, by extension, the Democratic Party, which is supporting their bizarre and dangerous behavior. Socialist indoctrination by our secondary schools and colleges, watering down of morals and cultural norms, and lack of Christian involvement in the political system have led us to this point in our history.

Typically, only about 1/3 of Christian registered votors vote in mid-term elections. Many historians and theologians have concluded that the failure of churches and individual Christians to actively resist the rise of Nazism was one of the significant factors that allowed the regime to consolidate power in Germany. If just 75% of all professing Christians voted with their traditional values in the November general election, the socialist movement in America would be completely irradicated. Aren’t your children and grandchildren worth that effort? Not one conservative with freedom-loving, patriotic, capitalist values should skip the polls this November. If you are not registered to vote, register now! Please share these critical concerns with your friends and loved ones.

Understanding Socialism

Bernie Sanders

One of the biggest mistakes of my generation was somehow allowing much of American society to degenerate from rational opposition to blind acceptance of socialism. We have sat idle while our replacement generation has lost sight of the grave dangers of this political and economic system. The best we can do now is to make a bold attempt to expose this evil for what it really is. This post is a move in that direction.

Socialism in a nutshell is giving up individual freedom and allowing the government to provide for our needs in exchange for making our decisions for us. It is an economic and political system that depends on a powerful, autocratic government. Socialism came of age with Karl Marx’s theories written as the Communist Manifesto in 1848. The socialist government can be totalitarian (a dictator), oligarchic (a powerful committee), or even democratic. Regardless of the structure, such a government determines what the people need and controls all business production and services to meet those needs. This results in an equitable distribution of wealth and material resources among all people with no competitive buying and selling in the market. Citizens are totally dependent on and subject to the government.

Prominent historical examples include the former Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, while current examples are China, Cuba, and Venezuela. Although some socialist governments have maintained a robust economy by controlling production, those countries’ citizens are ultimately oppressed and have little incentive to pursue a better quality of life.

In this election year, we are being told that the socialism of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren is not the failed socialism of the past but rather “Democratic” socialism. They point to the Scandinavian countries as examples instead of China, Cuba, and Venezuela. Sanders says he is not anti-business and declares he supports free elections. However, his proposed system of government is pure socialism. He advocates free health care, free college education, controls on income, and major government subsistence for low income earners. The astronomic costs of these government programs would be funded by huge tax increases on everyone. Oh yes, he says he will tax the rich to provide these comforts. The problem is these costs could not begin to be funded by taxing the top American earners at 100 percent. Taxes would be raised tremendously on almost everyone, which is exactly what socialism does. If the socialist government decides the people need more, it takes more from the people in the form of taxes. A democratically elected socialist government is still a socialist government that preys on its citizens.

The truth is that socialism has never worked effectively as a political and economic system…never!  Even in the Scandinavian countries, it reduces efficiency and initiative in production. It can easily take root in a poor country with a chaotic government looking for something different. When it does, it is usually the result of a revolution that leaves a trail of violence and death. But the “utopia” is short lived as the citizens figure out they are under oppression without freedom to determine their own destiny. Then it is too late. To bring socialism into a thriving economy under-girded with individual freedoms would be absolutely disastrous and absurd.

Free market capitalism has made America the richest, healthiest, most powerful, and most productive country in the history of the world. A recent study shows the poorest 20 percent of Americans consume more goods and services than the national averages for all people in most affluent countries including western Europe. In other words, if America’s “poor” were a nation, it would be one of the world’s richest. This is why we have such an immigration problem. Millions of people dream of coming to America. The greatness of America is the result of God’s blessing through two essential concepts: capitalism as the driver of our economy and individual liberty as the standard of our society. Both must exist simultaneously for the ultimate benefit of the people.

Granted, there are some downsides to capitalism. It does not ensure economic equality. Those who work hardest and are most productive will gain more wealth than others. Incentive is rewarded with better quality of life, while lethargy lessens quality of life. American capitalism, however, makes provision for the less fortunate with social programs supported by reasonable taxes of the more affluent. A cursory study of the American free market and individual freedoms proves that, despite some problems still needing to be resolved, our society is superior to any other in the world. Then why is seemingly half our population ready to trade that life for a much lesser life?

I believe the answer lies in two realities. First, the education of our youth, both parental and institutional, has largely avoided the socioeconomic truths that formed this great nation. Instead of factual studies of constitutional democracy, economic history, and comparative government, millennials and younger have been fed a scholastic diet of liberal psychology and social radicalism. They have learned the weaknesses of America but not its overriding strengths. Secondly, technology, liberal media, family breakdown, and the devaluation of discipline have produced a sense of entitlement, false security, and irresponsibility in our younger generation. Why wouldn’t they want more free stuff without regard to its source and ultimate cost to society? That is their experience, and they have not been taught the consequences. The reality that nothing is really free has been lost on most of them.

The future of America as we know it will depend on freedom-loving Americans showing up on election day to put down the revolution of socialism. We must also make every attempt to instill the truth in our children and grandchildren. We have to replace their indoctrination with factual counter positions. The future of our nation hangs in the balance.

Please “like” and share this post.

 

 

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑